André Barbosa - Sunday, November 23, 2025
Working with open educational resources and digital collections means navigating the sometimes confusing world of Creative Commons licenses and public domain designations. After three years of working with partners on publications, I've learned that understanding how these licenses work, and whom they restrict, is fundamental to effective collaboration and resource sharing.
One of Creative Commons' most elegant innovations is the three-layer design that makes licenses simultaneously legally enforceable, human-readable, and machine-discoverable.
The legally precise text written in formal legal language that holds up in court. It defines the exact terms of use with all the necessary legal terminology and provisions. While most people never read this layer, it's the foundation that makes CC licenses legally valid worldwide.
The human-readable summary that explains what users can and cannot do with the work in plain language. Think of it as the "user manual" for the license. When you see those familiar license badges on websites, clicking them takes you to this layer.
Hidden metadata embedded in the work that allows search engines, repositories, and other technologies to automatically recognize and understand the license terms. This makes CC-licensed works discoverable through specialized tools.
Why This Matters: This three-layer approach ensures that CC licenses work for lawyers, everyday users, and technology platforms simultaneously, making open content both legally sound and practically usable.
Creative Commons licenses are constructed from four basic elements that can be combined in different ways. Every CC license includes Attribution (BY), and the other three elements are optional additions.
Users must give appropriate credit to the creator, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. This element appears in all six CC licenses, it's the foundation of the system.
This restricts use to non-commercial purposes. Users can freely use the work for education, research, and personal projects, but cannot use it for commercial gain. Important: the original creator can still sell their own work.
If users create derivative works, they must distribute them under the same license as the original. This creates a "copyleft" effect, ensuring that adaptations remain open. Wikipedia uses this approach.
Users can copy and redistribute the work but cannot create adaptations or modifications. The work must be shared in its original form. Note: ND and SA are mutually exclusive.
Combining these elements creates six standard licenses, arranged here from most to least permissive.
Most permissive. Others can distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you. This is the recommended license for maximum dissemination and the standard for open access scholarly articles.
Others can remix and build upon your work even commercially, but must credit you and license new creations under identical terms. Wikipedia uses this license.
Others can remix and adapt your work non-commercially. Derivative works don't need to be licensed on the same terms, but all uses must be non-commercial and give credit.
Combines non-commercial restrictions with the ShareAlike requirement. Others can build upon your work non-commercially, but must credit you and license new creations identically.
Others can redistribute your work commercially or non-commercially with credit, but cannot modify it. Useful when you want wide distribution but want to maintain the work's integrity.
Most restrictive. Others can download and share your work with credit, but cannot change it or use it commercially. This significantly limits educational reuse.
These are NOT licenses: they are tools for dedicating works to or marking works already in the public domain.
A tool for creators to waive all their copyright and related rights in their work, dedicating it to the public domain. To the extent legally possible, the creator surrenders all copyright worldwide.
When to use: When you want to place your own work into the public domain with no conditions whatsoever, not even attribution is required, though it's always appreciated.
Perfect for: Research data, government documents, factual databases
A tool for marking works that are already in the public domain because copyright has expired, been forfeited, or is inapplicable. This is a label, not a legal instrument.
When to use: When you want to identify and label a work that is already in the public domain, making it easier for others to find and use.
Perfect for: Digitized historical materials, expired copyrights
What are Exceptions and Limitations? These are legal provisions that allow certain uses of copyrighted works without permission. In the US, this includes "fair use" for purposes like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Other countries have similar provisions called "fair dealing" or specific educational exceptions.
Key Principle: Exceptions ALWAYS Apply
Creative Commons licenses do not reduce, limit, or restrict any rights under exceptions and limitations to copyright. These rights exist independently and are preserved regardless of the license applied.
Practical Implication: If a use would be permitted under fair use or another copyright exception, a CC license cannot prohibit it. The license provides additional permissions beyond what copyright law already allows, it's always additive, never restrictive of existing rights.
The distinction between what licensors can do versus what licensees can do has been my biggest learning curve. The licensor (original copyright holder) always retains all rights and can separately license or sell their work however they choose. The restrictions in a CC license only apply to licensees: the people using the work.
This means when you license your work CC BY-NC, you're not preventing yourself from commercial use, you're only restricting others. And once you've applied a CC license, while you can stop distributing under that license, anyone who already obtained the work under those terms can continue using it forever. CC licenses are irrevocable.
Creative Commons licenses and public domain tools provide a flexible, legally sound framework for sharing and reusing creative and educational works. By understanding the three layers, four elements, six licenses, and two public domain tools, along with how they interact with existing copyright exceptions, institutions can make informed decisions that balance openness with appropriate protection.
The goal isn't always maximum openness; it's choosing the right tool for your specific situation and clearly communicating rights information to users. Whether you're creating OER, digitizing collections, or helping students license their work, understanding these fundamentals empowers better decision, making in service of the open culture mission.